🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of states are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," commented a leading MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any action must be "supported by strong data".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. An organization set up by the family of a young person who was lost after being exposed to disturbing platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design tools that are appropriate and suitable for young users," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the local government level amid country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain figures to mimic Australia's lead, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this international conversation unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.